Prepare for lasting inflation even after war ends
Even if the Middle East conflict ends sooner than expected, oil prices are unlikely to return to previous levels, raising the risk that inflationary pressures will persist far longer than policymakers may hope. For South Korea, heavily reliant on energy imports, the threat is not temporary volatility but a sustained cost shock that could weigh on both growth and consumer prices.
According to the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy (KIEP) on Thursday, oil prices could hover around $90 per barrel even under an early ceasefire scenario, as damaged energy infrastructure would take time to restore. If the conflict drags on, prices could rise to $117, and in the event of further disruptions to energy facilities, they could spike to as high as $174. Even these estimates may represent a lower bound, the institute warned, noting that higher crude prices would ultimately feed through producer costs into consumer inflation.
Uncertainty surrounding the conflict is also intensifying. Donald Trump said the United States would hit Iran “extremely hard” in the coming weeks, while also suggesting that oil-importing countries should take responsibility for securing supplies in the Strait of Hormuz. Such rhetoric underscores the risk that geopolitical tensions could further destabilize global energy markets.
The impact is already visible. South Korea’s consumer prices rose 2.2 percent in March, with petroleum prices surging 9.9 percent despite government efforts to contain inflation. With a supplementary budget of around 26 trillion won set to be injected into the economy, upward pressure on prices is likely to intensify.
The greater concern is that persistent inflation could coincide with slowing consumption and growth, raising the specter of stagflation. Waiting for a swift resolution to the conflict is no longer a viable strategy. Policymakers must instead prepare for a prolonged period of elevated energy costs.
South Korea should respond with a comprehensive policy framework akin to a wartime economic strategy — diversifying crude import sources, strengthening energy conservation measures and increasing the utilization of nuclear power. The government must mobilize all available tools to mitigate the long-term inflation shock and safeguard economic stability.
Copyright © 매일경제 & mk.co.kr. 무단 전재, 재배포 및 AI학습 이용 금지
- ‘큰손’ 연기금, 이란전쟁 터진 후 가장 많이 산 종목은? - 매일경제
- “한국인 한 달 살기 성지였는데”…최악 공기에 몸살 앓는 ‘이 도시’ - 매일경제
- 의사 죽자 의료진들 마취제 훔쳐 ‘프로포폴 파티’…사법당국 수사 - 매일경제
- “이미 늦었다. 전쟁전으로 못 돌아가”…오만과 호르무즈 규칙 만든다는 이란 - 매일경제
- “내 가방에 왜 손대?”…대형마트 직원 뺨 때린 60대 여성, 벌금 100만원 - 매일경제
- “지금의 한국 만든건 박정희·이병철”…日교수의 마지막 강의 화제 - 매일경제
- 美 ‘철강 완제품’ 관세 25% 일괄 부과…가전 수출 한국 기업 부담↑ - 매일경제
- 노인 무임승차 제한 시사한 이 대통령…“출퇴근 혼잡도 낮출 방안 마련하라” - 매일경제
- [단독] 기름 담보로 대출받은 주유소들 '문닫을 판' - 매일경제
- ‘홍명보호’ 박살 날 때 ‘1황’ 일본은 잉글랜드 꺾은 첫 亞 국가 됐다…5년간 유럽 상대 7승 1