AI-generated images depicting prostitution circulate online

Lee Jung-joo 2025. 5. 12. 15:40
음성재생 설정 이동 통신망에서 음성 재생 시 데이터 요금이 발생할 수 있습니다. 글자 수 10,000자 초과 시 일부만 음성으로 제공합니다.
글자크기 설정 파란원을 좌우로 움직이시면 글자크기가 변경 됩니다.

이 글자크기로 변경됩니다.

(예시) 가장 빠른 뉴스가 있고 다양한 정보, 쌍방향 소통이 숨쉬는 다음뉴스를 만나보세요. 다음뉴스는 국내외 주요이슈와 실시간 속보, 문화생활 및 다양한 분야의 뉴스를 입체적으로 전달하고 있습니다.

Accounts promoting prostitution are removed, but expression isn’t clear violation: Meta
Four-panel cartoons, generated through ChatGPT, depict the working environments of sex workers in South Korea. (Screenshotted from Instagram)

Amid a surge in generative AI use, South Korea has seen a rise in Instagram accounts — allegedly run by sex workers — using ChatGPT-generated images to share stories related to illegal prostitution, prompting criticism toward Meta for failing to take appropriate action despite the accounts’ potential legal violations.

On Instagram, numerous accounts can be found sharing AI-generated images and comics depicting the working environments of sex workers in Korea, where prostitution is prohibited by law.

With account bios reading, “Based on real stories from the girls” and “Touching real-life experiences illustrated with AI,” the accounts show illustrations in a comic-like style.

One illustration found on such an account depicts a woman getting her hair and makeup done at a salon as she waits for a “call,” or a vehicle that picks up "hosts" before driving them to their clients.

Another account, which mainly posts four-panel cartoons of sex workers’ personal lives as well as some happenings at work, depicts women receiving high-priced gifts such as designer bags from their clients as well as their experiences interacting with clients deemed rude or disrespectful. On this account, a cartoon posted as an Instagram Reel titled “How to deal with old customers” had garnered 5.8 million views as of Monday.

Though most of the Instagram accounts were created no earlier than April, many of them have already gained traction, ranging from 5,000 to 9,000 followers.

This photo shows account bios of the Instagram accounts reportedly run by sex workers in Korea as well as the follower counts, which range between 5,000 to 9,000 followers. (Screenshotted from Instagram)

A number of Koreans have voiced discomfort regarding the emergence of such Instagram accounts.

“I see accounts like this way too many times on Instagram. Every time I do, I make sure to report the account, but Instagram doesn’t seem to be doing much about it,” 30-year-old Kim Jin-kyeong told The Korea Herald.

Under South Korean law, promoting prostitution or a business place that provides prostitution as its service is explicitly prohibited, according to the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts.

Meta’s community guidelines also prohibit content that facilitates, encourages or coordinates commercial sexual services, even if the content is presented in a narrative or artistic manner.

Lawyer Min Go-eun told The Korea Herald that such accounts could face legal action, though they also “hold some loopholes.”

“As it posts suggestive content that holds potential in romanticizing sex work and also provides means of contact to the individuals behind such accounts, one can say that it holds potential in violating South Korean law,” said Min. “However, there are some loopholes, in which the account owners can claim that they didn’t promote sex work, as (the accounts) don’t explicitly promote sexual services to their followers."

An official from Meta also told The Korea Herald that such accounts still require additional review to determine whether they clearly violate the platform's policies.

“Instagram accounts and posts are reviewed for violations in accordance with our community guidelines and appropriate actions are taken after that,” said the official. “If an account promotes illegal prostitution, Meta will definitely make sure such accounts are removed. However, in cases where the content holds potential of being determined a mere form of expression rather than promotion, it's hard for Meta to take a stance against that, as a form of speech cannot be said to be a violation of our policies.”

Copyright © 코리아헤럴드. 무단전재 및 재배포 금지.