[Francis Wilkinson] Republican redefinition of an American
이 글자크기로 변경됩니다.
(예시) 가장 빠른 뉴스가 있고 다양한 정보, 쌍방향 소통이 숨쉬는 다음뉴스를 만나보세요. 다음뉴스는 국내외 주요이슈와 실시간 속보, 문화생활 및 다양한 분야의 뉴스를 입체적으로 전달하고 있습니다.
Using specific dates to define entire eras is often a gimmick, a way of compressing wild and unwieldy life into a neatly artificial package. But some days, or years, just massively overproduce, leaving behind a nation, or world, transformed. As a quote typically attributed to Vladimir Lenin has it, “There are decades where nothing happens, and there are weeks where decades happen.”
For the reactionaries who drive Republican politics today, one year looms like Godzilla over a darkening conservative skyline: 1965. Sam the Sham and the Pharaohs had a jabberwocky hit song in “Wooly Bully,” and President Lyndon Johnson signed into law the Hart-Celler Immigration Act and the Voting Rights Act.
“Wooly Bully” isn’t what bothers conservatives.
The Voting Rights Act and Hart-Celler profoundly altered the nation. As potent as each law was on its own terms, combined the two were monumental. In effect, one opened the door to nonwhite immigration, the other to nonwhite political power. For racial reactionaries, it’s a frightening combination, which is why supporters of the immigration bill tried to calm conservative fears during debate. The law would not “upset the ethnic mix of our society,” Sen. Edward Kennedy said.
It turned out that Kennedy was wrong. In 1960, whites constituted 88.6 percent of the US population. By 2020, that number had fallen to 58.9 percent. In 1960, only 5 percent of the US population was foreign-born. In 2020, it was 13.6 percent. On the 50th anniversary of the immigration act, in 2015, Pew Research Center reported that nearly 59 million immigrants had come to the US since 1965.
None of that may matter to people who value pluralistic democracy over racial hegemony. But to those who prefer their power white, and their democracy weak, the consequences are stark. Black voters and white liberals alone could not have made Barack Obama president. Hispanic and Asian voters, the children of immigrants, were necessary to put Obama’s multi-racial coalition in power.
For Republicans to compete nationwide, they must either lure some of those voters away from Democrats or keep them away from the polls. They have opted to try both.
For a while now, Republicans have been working to make it harder to vote, harder to count votes and harder for the electoral winners to reap the rewards of victory. Vote by mail, drop boxes and other efforts to make voting as convenient as, say, purchasing a firearm continue to be under attack. Conspiracy-minded conservatives -- roughly 29 percent of the party is in thrall to QAnon according to a recent poll -- advocate hand counts of ballots, which introduce error into counting rather than mitigating it. And when Ohio voters overwhelmingly passed a constitutional protection for abortion rights this year, Republican state legislators immediately began looking for ways to override the popular will, essentially seeking to nullify the vote.
Last month, in a case challenging legislative maps in Arkansas, the US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ruled 2–1 that only the US Department of Justice -- no private parties -- could file voting rights challenges in court under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. If the radical ruling is allowed to stand it will effectively enable a president to undermine voting rights anywhere in the land, simply by telling a politicized Justice Department to ignore violations.
It's doubtful any of these concerted assaults on voting would be taking place absent the demographic changes initiated by the 1965 immigration act. Conservatives can’t do very much about the demographic challenge; even a complete halt to immigration today would not alter the multi-racial trajectory of the 21st century. Lots of babies are still being born. But they can hobble democracy to preserve White overrepresentation in powerful institutions. That imbalance isn’t restricted to the GOP in Congress. For instance, a Bloomberg Law analysis found that of the 94 federal district courts, 25 have never had a non-white judge.
Ultimately, the attack on voting is an attack on who gets to be an American and exercise the power and privileges that accompany that title. The American identity began to broaden beyond White natives in 1965, encompassing newly empowered Blacks (and Native Americans) and newly admitted immigrants. If conspiracy theorists really want to find the point when the dastardly “Great Replacement” of Whites in the US began, they should stop troubling themselves with nonsense about the Southern border or shadowy billionaires. The birth of a multiracial nation took place in 1965 in Washington. It was accomplished in public, by majority vote. Democratically.
Francis Wilkinson
Francis Wilkinson is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering US politics and policy. -- Ed.
(Tribune Content Agency)
By Korea Herald(khnews@heraldcorp.com)
Copyright © 코리아헤럴드. 무단전재 및 재배포 금지.