Samsung Electronics at risk of Wi-Fi patent battle with Caltech
이 글자크기로 변경됩니다.
(예시) 가장 빠른 뉴스가 있고 다양한 정보, 쌍방향 소통이 숨쉬는 다음뉴스를 만나보세요. 다음뉴스는 국내외 주요이슈와 실시간 속보, 문화생활 및 다양한 분야의 뉴스를 입체적으로 전달하고 있습니다.
According to industry sources on Wednesday, the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board recently dismissed three out of four filings by Samsung Electronics seeking invalidation against Caltech‘s patents. The remaining claim is still under review.
The patent conflict between Caltech and Samsung Electronics began following a dispute between Apple Inc., Broadcom Inc. and Caltech in 2016. Caltech filed a lawsuit against Apple and Broadcom in a district court in Los Angeles, alleging those companies infringed its data transmission patents. The court ruled in favor of Caltech in 2020 and the jury ordered Apple to pay $837.8 million and Broadcom to pay $270.2 million to Caltech in damages.
Based on the court order, in 2021, Caltech filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Samsung Electronics to the federal court for the Eastern District of Texas, accusing the South Korean company of unauthorized use of five Wi-Fi patents. Three of the patents claimed in the lawsuit against Apple were also applied to the case against Samsung Electronics, covering a wide range of products from smartphones, tablets and laptops to smartwatches and smart TVs.
In response, Samsung Electronics challenged the patents’ validity in November, while requesting the East Texas federal court that the court suspend the ruling until the results of the patent invalidation are available.
However, with the recent three dismissals of Samsung Electronics’ claims, Caltech’s rights over the patents are likely to be affirmed. Caltech also effectively won in the Apple lawsuit on Monday, adding more pressure on Samsung Electronics.
On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected appeals by Apple and Broadcom, upholding the lower court’s decision in favor of Caltech. In February 2022, Apple and Broadcom appealed to the Supreme Court, seeking a re-examination of the interpretation by the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals. As the Supreme Court did not accept their appeal, the two companies are now facing a ruling that will determine the amount of damages to be paid to Caltech, with the hope of a reduced compensation compared with the initial order that exceeded $750 million.
Industry insiders speculate that Samsung Electronics is likely to face a similar amount sought from Caltech, given they are arguing over similar patents. The Biden administration’s support for Caltech also poses a challenge for Samsung Electronics. According to media reports, prior to the court’s ruling, U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar urged the Supreme Court to reject Apple’s appeal.
Copyright © 매일경제 & mk.co.kr. 무단 전재, 재배포 및 AI학습 이용 금지
- “남편 수강료 들고 잠적, 죄송”…지방선거 출마했던 필라테스 강사의 눈물 - 매일경제
- 제주 광어 떼죽음… ‘펄펄’ 끓는 바다를 어쩌나 - 매일경제
- “노후 생각하셔야죠!”...퇴직연금도 ‘평생연금’ 추진 [김혜진의 알쓸경법] - 매일경제
- “사장님들 갚아야할 돈 1조원 입니다”…5대은행 청구서 날벼락 - 매일경제
- “나빠질게 하나도 없네”…낙관론 확산되는 이유 들여다보니 - 매일경제
- 박지현, ‘황의조 사생활 SNS 폭로’에 “피해자 남녀 불문 보호해야” - 매일경제
- 마치 말을 타는듯 부드러운 가속…“렉서스가 렉서스했다” 감탄 [시승기] - 매일경제
- 부동산 투자이민 1조넘게 몰렸지만 제주에만 반짝 … 영주권 받고 먹튀도 - 매일경제
- “일하지 말고, 시험공부 해라”…4주휴가 흔쾌히 내준 회사 [금융 라운지] - 매일경제
- 페이커, 항저우아시안게임 외국인 최고 스타 선정 - MK스포츠