Daol’s second-biggest shareholder raises questions on acquisition purpose
이 글자크기로 변경됩니다.
(예시) 가장 빠른 뉴스가 있고 다양한 정보, 쌍방향 소통이 숨쉬는 다음뉴스를 만나보세요. 다음뉴스는 국내외 주요이슈와 실시간 속보, 문화생활 및 다양한 분야의 뉴스를 입체적으로 전달하고 있습니다.
According to regulatory fillings at the Financial Supervisory Service and industry sources on Friday, Kim Gi-soo and his relative, a real estate company Soonsoo Asset and Kim’s Presto Investment Management own a total of 8,736,629 shares of Daol, a combined 14.34 percent stake in the company.
Kim started to buy Daol stocks on April 28 after the company’s stock price plunged on April 24, following the sell-off triggered by contract for difference (CFD) trades at Societe Generale Securities.
Kim, his relative Choi and Soonsoo Asset acquired a stake in Daol of 11.5 percent through Kim’s Presto Investment Management, by May 8. They made additional purchases in the open market for 2.84 percent of shares, resulting in a current ownership of 14.34 percent stake controlled by Kim and his related parties.
The shares owned by Kim and related parties is second after the 25.26 percent stake owned by Daol Chairman Lee Byung-chul himself, with a mere 11 percent difference between the largest shareholder and the second-largest shareholder.
Kim stated in a regulatory filing that the purchase was a “simple acquisition” and that the purpose of ownership was for “general investment,” the same as in the earlier filing.
However, some argue that Kim and his related parties should be subject to a review, to assess their suitability as major shareholders of a financial institution required under the relevant law, as they hold more than 14 percent stake in Daol Investment & Securities, despite the stakes being technically in the names of different subjects.
Regulations state that a major shareholder of financial institutions must obtain prior approval from financial authorities. This requirement is put in place to assess the capital capacity, financial soundness and credit of the potential major shareholder, enabling regulators to control any unqualified entry into the financial industry.
Under the Korean law regulating corporate government of financial institutions, any person - excluding “specially related persons” - who holds more than 10 percent of the outstanding voting shares of a financial institution is subject to a major shareholder suitability assessment. The law defines a “person who holds at least 10/100 of the total number of outstanding voting shares of a financial company in their own account, irrespective of in whose name the shares are held” as being a “large shareholder.”
“If the shareholding exceeds 10 percent, it becomes a ‘major shareholder’ and must be approved beforehand,” said an official of the FSS. “However, under the law regulating capital market, the definition of a ‘major shareholder’ is focused on the de facto control over the share, and holdings by specially related persons is not necessarily considered,” the regulator added.
At the moment, Kim’s stake in Daol held in his name is 7.07 percent, Choi’s is 6.40 percent, and Soonsoo Asset holds 0.87 percent of the shares outstanding.
The regulatory filing shows that Kim and Choi share the same address, which leads to the assumption that they are members of the same household. Soonsoo Asset is a real estate leasing company established in 2007. It is believed to be a family company owned by Kim and his son, who has a legal entity in Singapore. Presto Investment Management, as well, is owned 100 percent by Kim and Choi.
According to Supreme Court precedent, the criteria to determine whether stock acquisition in question is made in one‘s own account includes whether the source of the funds for the stock acquisition is the shareholder, and if both profits and losses belong to the shareholder.
Irrespective of the actual name on the account, if the shares owned by Kim and related parties are regarded as being held “in his own account,” it could be understood that Kim is a major shareholder with a stake of over 10 percent.
“Based solely on the information in the regulatory filing, the shareholders of the stakes are not believed to be held in one person’s own account, and thus are not subject to an assessment, but we’re keeping an eye on it,” said an official from the FSS.
Kim’s acquisition of the shares was not initially flagged by regulators, as the purchases were made within a short period of time after the sell-off triggered by Societe Generale Securities, and the details surrounding the purchases were not clear.
It is stated that the stakes bought by Kim and Choi are “investments by an institutional investor,” not by individual investors.
“When the investor is an institution, it’s usually not suspect of being an attempt at a hostile merger & acquisition or for management control,” said an industry insider.
Many individual traders and spectators are guessing as to Kim’s intentions. Some of them in fact noted that some intensive purchases were made in short periods of time through a certain brokerage firm, even before Kim’s mandatory regulatory filing, and they predicted the possibility of another major shareholder.
“There are many stocks that are undervalued or have higher dividends than Daol. A stake of more than 14 percent cannot be an investment without any other intention,” one online commenter said, expecting to hear some comment back from Kim in the near future.
Copyright © 매일경제 & mk.co.kr. 무단 전재, 재배포 및 AI학습 이용 금지
- “자고 일어나니 수억원 올랐어요”...주민들 함박웃음 짓겠네 - 매일경제
- 삼성 따라가길 잘했네…한번 접어본 소비자들이 환호한 이 제품 - 매일경제
- “싸지만 너무 좋은데, 3천만원대車 맞나”…변강쇠 품은 구두쇠, 코나EV [카슐랭] - 매일경제
- “10년 만에 대목 오나”…때이른 품절대란, 원인은 기후변화 탓? - 매일경제
- ‘하얀 석유’ 싹쓸이할 판…위험한 나라만 골라 투자하는 중국 - 매일경제
- “아들아, 30만명 신청한 곳도 있대”…부모님도 급한 대출 갈아타기 - 매일경제
- 버거킹서 미끄러진 40대男…100억 손해배상 소송서 이겼다 - 매일경제
- '대마초 합법화' 택한 네덜란드의 비극 [세계사로 배우는 시사] - 매일경제
- “일본 생각만 하면 웃음 나와”...재미 본 한국인들, 이번엔 ‘엔화’로 - 매일경제
- 여준석 미국대학농구 데뷔 시즌 주전 확보? - MK스포츠