Prosecutors Cause Bereaved Families of Itaewon Disaster More Pain: One Prosecutor Mentioned the Possibility of Drugs when Suggesting an Autopsy
이 글자크기로 변경됩니다.
(예시) 가장 빠른 뉴스가 있고 다양한 정보, 쌍방향 소통이 숨쉬는 다음뉴스를 만나보세요. 다음뉴스는 국내외 주요이슈와 실시간 속보, 문화생활 및 다양한 분야의 뉴스를 입체적으로 전달하고 있습니다.
News that a prosecutor mentioned drugs when asking the family of an Itaewon crowd crush victim if they wanted an autopsy was belatedly released, stirring controversy.
According to the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office on December 4, on October 30, the day after the Halloween crowd crush, a prosecutor from the Gwangju District Prosecutors’ Office visited a funeral parlor in Gwangju and asked a victim’s family if they wanted an autopsy. When suggesting the autopsy, the prosecutor mentioned the possibility of drugs and the need to identify the accurate cause of death. He said that an autopsy would give them a clear cause of death--whether it was due to pressure on the chest or due to drugs--mentioning the possibility of drugs.
The family opposed and the autopsy was never conducted. Reportedly, the family fiercely protested when the prosecutor mentioned drugs. In an interview with MBC on Sunday, the victim’s younger sister said, “He (the prosecutor) said that there were rumors about drugs, but that there was no concrete evidence, and suggested we conduct an autopsy. We were outraged because he seemed to accuse my sister of doing drugs based on a rumor.”
Earlier, some people raised the allegation that the police did not assign officers to control the crowd in Itaewon on the day of the tragedy unlike previous years because they were intent on cracking down on drugs. In fact, on the day of the crowd crush, a total of 137 police officers were assigned to Itaewon, and among them 79 were there to crack down on drugs and prevent crimes. The Yongsan Police Station sent the press a text message announcing a massive crackdown on drugs until nine minutes before the crowd crush.
On Sunday, a representative of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office announced, “The prosecutors never requested an autopsy because of drugs,” and explained, “At the time, there were many reports of drug-related damages, and the prosecutor mentioned the reports and told the victim’s family to consider it when deciding on the autopsy.” He further explained, “It appears there was a misunderstanding as the prosecutor tried to explain various possibilities to clarify the cause of death.”
The representative said, “An individual’s use of drugs and drug-related crimes are not the target of the prosecutors’ investigation. There was no reason or grounds for the supervisors in the Prosecution Service to instruct prosecutors to conduct drug-related autopsies.” He further said, “At the time, the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office instructed employees to deliver the victims’ bodies to the bereaved families as quickly as possible and to decide whether to conduct the autopsies after respecting the wishes of the families as much as possible,” and added, “We received a report that the other prosecutors never mentioned anything about drugs.”
Copyright © 경향신문. 무단전재 및 재배포 금지.
- 이재명 “얼마나 간이 부었으면···검사인지 깡패인지 알 수 없다”
- 야당, 최은순씨 가석방 ‘적격’ 판정에 “윤석열 사위의 어버이날 선물?”
- [종합] “왜 김수현에게만 이런일이” 화장실 갔다가 딱 걸린 인기상 수상자
- 부모님 효도선물 콘서트 티켓, 나훈아가 2위…1위는?
- 왕년 액션스타 스티븐 시걸, 푸틴 취임식서 “세계 최고 지도자” 칭송
- 인감증명서 도입 110년 만에…9월30일부터 일부 온라인 발급 가능해져
- ‘유시민 누나’ 유시춘 EBS 이사장 사무실 압수수색
- 김신영 날린 ‘전국노래자랑’ 한달 성적은…남희석의 마이크가 무겁다
- 국가주석에 국회의장까지 권력 빅4 중 2명 숙청···격랑의 베트남 정치
- 수능 6등급도 교대 합격···상위권 문과생들 “교사 안 할래요”