Singer Park Hwayobi ordered to pay agency 330 million won for violating contract
전체 맥락을 이해하기 위해서는 본문 보기를 권장합니다.
"The court acknowledges that there was abusive language and malicious behavior surrounding the defendant, but it does not see that such actions were enough to pressure her into signing the contract," the court revealed on Sunday. "There is no evidence to show that she entered into the contract against her will."
"The defendant continually failed to comply with the obligations outlined in the contract," it said. "This broke the trust which is the basis of contract, and thus, the defendant is responsible for breaking the contract."
이 글자크기로 변경됩니다.
(예시) 가장 빠른 뉴스가 있고 다양한 정보, 쌍방향 소통이 숨쉬는 다음뉴스를 만나보세요. 다음뉴스는 국내외 주요이슈와 실시간 속보, 문화생활 및 다양한 분야의 뉴스를 입체적으로 전달하고 있습니다.
Seoul Central District Court ordered singer Park Hwayobi to pay 330 million won ($239,600) to her former entertainment agency Music Authority for violating her contract.
In 2019, Music Authority paid Park's tax arrears of some 290 million won and subsequently altered its contract with the singer to state that it no longer owed her a payment of 300 million won that she was promised in her original contract which she signed in 2017.
In February 2020, Park requested the termination of her contract with Music Authority. However, the agency refused, claiming it had suffered significant financial damages because of Park.
When the dispute continued, Music Authority sued Park.
During the trial, the agency claimed that Park was responsible for breaking the contract and sued her for a total of 410 million won — 300 million won in down payment, 110 million won in damages and 30 million won which the company claimed that she borrowed and did not pay back.
Park argued that she had been pressured into the contract by the CEO of Music Authority, citing civil law which states that one may violate a contract if he or she was coerced or tricked into it.
"The court acknowledges that there was abusive language and malicious behavior surrounding the defendant, but it does not see that such actions were enough to pressure her into signing the contract," the court revealed on Sunday. "There is no evidence to show that she entered into the contract against her will."
The court also cited that Park had only released three songs that she sang herself while the contract required that she release 50.
"The defendant continually failed to comply with the obligations outlined in the contract," it said. "This broke the trust which is the basis of contract, and thus, the defendant is responsible for breaking the contract."
However, the court dismissed Music Authority's claim of 110 million won in reparations, citing a lack of evidence to prove the agency's claim that it spent this amount producing Park's songs.
In a separate case, the CEO of Music Authority surnamed Yoo sued Park for 20 million won that he claimed Park borrowed from him but never paid back. The court ruled in favor of Yoo and ordered that Park repay him.
Park is an R&B artist who debuted in 2000 with her first full-length album "My All." She is best known for songs such as "Something Like That" (2000), "Eot-teon Gayo" (2002), "Girl Like Me" (2010) and "Bye Bye Bye" (2010). Her latest music was an EP titled "Sunset." It was released in November last year.
BY LEE JIAN [lee.jian@joongang.co.kr]
Copyright © 코리아중앙데일리. 무단전재 및 재배포 금지.
- BTS's RM donates 100 million won for preservation, restoration of Korean artifacts
- [WHY] Koreans' love for spicy foods: Crazy trend or comfort food?
- Overseas Koreans told to take care after Suriname's threat of legal action against Netflix series
- Son Heung-min silences critics with sensational 13-minute hat-trick
- Suspect in subway restroom murder found to be victim's stalker, colleague
- [VIDEO] Son Heung-min looks to repeat phenomenal May goal against Leicester
- Korean dancer Honey J makes marriage, pregnancy announcement
- Suriname's foreign minister says country will take legal action against producers over unfair portrayal
- BTS's mega-concert is causing big headaches in Busan
- Is 'Extraordinary Attorney Woo' helping or hurting the autism community?