KHNP argues for greater nuclear reactor role to achieve zero carbon goal

Oh Chan-jong, Park Dong-hwan and Lee Soo-min 입력 2021. 9. 15. 13:15 수정 2021. 9. 17. 09:30
글자크기 설정 파란원을 좌우로 움직이시면 글자크기가 변경 됩니다.

이 글자크기로 변경됩니다.

(예시) 가장 빠른 뉴스가 있고 다양한 정보, 쌍방향 소통이 숨쉬는 다음뉴스를 만나보세요. 다음뉴스는 국내외 주요이슈와 실시간 속보, 문화생활 및 다양한 분야의 뉴스를 입체적으로 전달하고 있습니다.

Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co. (KHNP), the state operator of nuclear reactors that had complied with the government order to shut down Wolsong Unit 1 before its legitime lifetime, formally asked the government to revisit its nuclear phase-out plan to enable greater nuclear role for stable energy supply in carbon neutrality goal.

According to government and industry sources, KHNP formally contested to the long-term plan of achieving carbon neutrality by 2050 by plugging off aged coal and nuclear generators without adding new ones during a public hearing with the national carbon neutrality committee on Tuesday.

Under the scheme, only nine reactors would be left by 2050 to reduce the power sourcing from reactors to 6 to 7 percent from current 25 percent.

The operator argued too many uncertainties remained to achieve zero carbon goal primarily relying on renewables, demanding a revisit to the outline including flexibility in nuclear phase-out.

The nuclear phase-out plan has been one of the key agenda of the President Moon Jae-in¡¯s administration. The presidential committee on carbon neutrality proposes to cut the number of nuclear power plants to 18 by 2030 and then to nine by 2050.

KHNP cited other governments that have been increasing nuclear reactors to achieve carbon emission goal.

The U.S. government is building more nuclear power plants and next-generation nuclear plants like small modular reactors as a promising source of clean energy as part of its carbon neutrality pledges. Japan also announced its energy plan in July to maintain the proportion of nuclear power at 22 percent in the energy mix in 2030.

The industry backed the argument.

Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction contended that the government must come up with a back-up plan as renewable energy sources alone will not be enough to handle peak demand periods. Hanwha Energy also noted that the near-sighted decision to close conventional power plants will pose a threat to national energy security.

Ban Ki-moon, former UN Secretary-General and chairman of the National Council on Climate and Air Quality, also opposed the government¡¯s anti-nuclear policy, saying that it would be difficult to supply a sustained renewable energy given the geographical conditions and climate environment of Korea.

The Moon administration remained steadfast to its energy outline. The Framework Act on Carbon Neutrality and Green Growth passed the National Assembly in August and a bill to promulgate the law passed the cabinet Tuesday.

The carbon neutrality committee will announce the final 2050 carbon neutrality initiative next month after collecting opinions from various stakeholders and the general public.

[¨Ï Maeil Business Newspaper & mk.co.kr, All rights reserved]

Copyright © 매일경제 & mk.co.kr. 무단 전재, 재배포 및 AI학습 이용 금지

이 기사에 대해 어떻게 생각하시나요?