[Editorial] Key question remains: Did prosecutors meddle?
전체 맥락을 이해하기 위해서는 본문 보기를 권장합니다.
On Sunday, Cho said in an interview with SBS that Sept. 2, the date when Newsverse first reported on the allegations, was "not the date that [Park] and I wanted." As that footage made the rounds on YouTube, the situation took on the name "Park Jie-won-gate."
In a Facebook post Monday, Cho called the accusations against her and Park "ridiculously contrived."
이 글자크기로 변경됩니다.
(예시) 가장 빠른 뉴스가 있고 다양한 정보, 쌍방향 소통이 숨쉬는 다음뉴스를 만나보세요. 다음뉴스는 국내외 주요이슈와 실시간 속보, 문화생활 및 다양한 분야의 뉴스를 입체적으로 전달하고 있습니다.
The People Power Party (PPP) is desperately trying to apply an “opposition plot” frame to allegations that the prosecutors attempted to incite a particular party to submit criminal complaints against pro-Democratic Party figures ahead of last year’s general election.
Since the allegations first surfaced, the PPP and its leading presidential contender, former Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-youl, had been trying to turn the tide by framing the allegations as “political maneuvering” by the Democratic Party.
After it came to light that whistleblower Cho Seong-eun — a former election committee vice chairperson for the United Future Party (UFP), the PPP’s previous incarnation — dined last month with National Intelligence Service (NIS) Director Park Jie-won, they ramped up their counteroffensive, claiming that the reporting of the allegations was itself a “plot” by the two of them.
On Sunday, Cho said in an interview with SBS that Sept. 2, the date when Newsverse first reported on the allegations, was “not the date that [Park] and I wanted.” As that footage made the rounds on YouTube, the situation took on the name “Park Jie-won-gate.”
Their claim is that a current NIS chief mobilized a young politician and online media in a media “operation” aimed at bringing down a strong presidential contender from the opposition party.
The fact that the whistleblower met one-on-one with the NIS director before the allegations were reported in the press is not something we should take lightly. During his time in the National Assembly, Park was known by the nickname “political black belt.” If he did in fact have a meal separately with the whistleblower without anyone else present, we can’t rule out the possibility that she may have sought some kind of advice concerning the allegations.
In a Facebook post Monday, Cho called the accusations against her and Park “ridiculously contrived.”
“I did not consider the details concerning Yoon as something to ‘discuss’ with Park Jie-won, and the report a month later on Sept. 2 was like an accident that I could never have predicted the day before,” she wrote.
In a telephone interview with the Hankyoreh on Monday, Park said, “I’m not an idiot. We never had that kind of conversation.”
If there are still questions to be raised after these clarifications, Park should appear himself before the National Assembly’s Intelligence Committee to explain the details — or comply fully with an investigation, if it comes to that.
But regardless of what Park and Cho did talk about, it doesn’t change the fact that at its core, this case is about whether the prosecutors incited the complaints.
From the facts that have come to light so far, it was in early April 2020 that PPP lawmaker Kim Woong received Telegram messages containing draft complaints against opposition party figures and a court ruling concerning someone surnamed Ji, which he passed along to Cho and others.
The documents are alleged to have come from a prosecutor — believed to be Son Jun-seong, a Supreme Prosecutors’ Office (SPO) investigation intelligence policy officer — at a time when Kim was a candidate for the general election in April 2020.
Cho kept her copy for over a year before disclosing it to a Newsverse reporter on July 21 of this year. That means it was a separate issue that happened before the meeting between her and Park — something Yoon’s election camp and the PPP leadership know full well.
It’s time for them to stop trying to paper over the nature of the allegations with their own accusations over incidental matters. Instead, they ought to be cooperating actively with the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials (CIO) investigation and the SPO questioning to get to the bottom of things.
In that sense, the PPP did the sensible thing being relatively compliant with the CIO’s execution of a search and seizure warrant on Kim Woong’s office Monday, after physically blocking a previous attempt on Friday.
Park Jie-won’s conduct should also be scrutinized. As head of the NIS, he is strictly barred from involvement in domestic politics, and when he meets and dines frequently with political and media figures he knows from his politician days, people are inevitably going to view that as inappropriate. He will need to be more circumspect with his words and actions.
Please direct questions or comments to [email@example.com]
ⓒ 한겨레신문사, 무단전재 및 재배포 금지
- 손준성도 윤석열처럼 “국정원장 개입 의혹 수사해야”
- 삼성 갤럭시OS 무산시킨 구글, 한국서 역대급 제재 받는다
- 이재용, 가석방 뒤 ‘청년 일자리’로 첫 외부 일정…김부겸 총리 동석
- #내옷건들지마…부르카 벗은 아프간 여성들이 입은 옷은?
- ‘당 직인’ 찍힌 고발장에 침묵…국민의힘, 윤석열과 ‘선긋기’ 통할까
- 소도 화장실 간다, 기후변화 막기 위해
- 상하이서 맴도는 ‘찬투’ 17일 새벽에 제주 거쳐 남해상 통과
- 다래끼 치료하러 간 초등학생, 병원 실수로 화이자 백신 접종
- 대통령도 손가락 느리면 못 산다, ‘캐스퍼’ 1호차 주인공은 누구?
- 한가위 보름달 서울서 오후 6시59분 뜬다