Assessment system for ESG lacks consistency: FKI

2021. 4. 26. 16:13
글자크기 설정 파란원을 좌우로 움직이시면 글자크기가 변경 됩니다.

이 글자크기로 변경됩니다.

(예시) 가장 빠른 뉴스가 있고 다양한 정보, 쌍방향 소통이 숨쉬는 다음뉴스를 만나보세요. 다음뉴스는 국내외 주요이슈와 실시간 속보, 문화생활 및 다양한 분야의 뉴스를 입체적으로 전달하고 있습니다.

(FKI)

Appraisals for ESG -- the management trend that focuses on environmental, social and governance factors -- tend to lack consistency as different rating agencies apply different standards, a major business representation here said Monday.

According to a report by the Federation of Korean Industries, about 40 percent of businesses witnessed a conspicuous variation in the ESG ratings they have received from key evaluation agencies.

The given study included 55 companies among the nation’s top 100 in revenue that have had their ESG rating announced by all of the three ESG evaluators -- Morgan Stanley Caapital International, Refinitiv, and the Korea Corporate Governance Service.

The corresponding companies saw ratings deviate by an average of 1.4 levels and 22 of them saw a deviation of three levels or more, indicating a lack of evaluation consistency. The ESG rating system comprises seven levels in total.

Global businesses were no exception. According to a survey by the world’s largest asset manager BlackRock, a similar deviation was observed among the 217 companies that constitute the ESG exchange trade funds.

The problem is that each agency adopts its own evaluating and value weighting system, according to the FKI.

For instance, MSCI takes into account factors such as climate change, natural resources, pollution waste and environmental opportunities when assessing environmental aspects. The KGS, on the other hand, focuses more on environmental strategies, related organizations, and achievements. Refinitiv places value on eco-friendly product innovation and waste emission.

The FKI also claimed that global agencies tends to discriminate businesses according to their nationality, suspecting a so-called “Korea discount” in ESG evaluation.

“Regarding the wide deviation and lack of consistency in ESG evaluations, each company should stipulate their benchmarks and indexes, based on the direction and goal of their respective ESG policies,” the federation said.

South Korean government is working to introduce a standard ESG index for local firms.

The Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy last week unveiled a draft version of the envisioned index, which has four main categories -- transparency, environment, society and corporate governance -- and has total 61 subcategories. It is expected to be finalized in the second half of this year.

By Bae Hyun-jung (tellme@heraldcorp.com)

<ⓒKoreaHerald(www.koreaherald.com)무단전재 및 재배포 금지>

Copyright © 코리아헤럴드. 무단전재 및 재배포 금지.

이 기사에 대해 어떻게 생각하시나요?