Ramseyer's comfort women paper unlikely to be printed in March

한겨레 2021. 3. 4. 17:36
글자크기 설정 파란원을 좌우로 움직이시면 글자크기가 변경 됩니다.

이 글자크기로 변경됩니다.

(예시) 가장 빠른 뉴스가 있고 다양한 정보, 쌍방향 소통이 숨쉬는 다음뉴스를 만나보세요. 다음뉴스는 국내외 주요이슈와 실시간 속보, 문화생활 및 다양한 분야의 뉴스를 입체적으로 전달하고 있습니다.

The journal's editor has asked Ramseyer to respond to criticism
Harvard Law School professor J. Mark Ramseyer. (Screenshot from Harvard Law School website)

It looks as if the academic journal that’s supposed to carry a paper by Harvard Law School professor J. Mark Ramseyer that describes the former comfort women as voluntary prostitutes won’t be going to print in March as originally planned.

Yonhap News reported Wednesday that Eric Helland, editor of International Review of Law and Economics, which is published by Elsevier, has asked Ramseyer to respond to criticism from other scholars by Mar. 31. Since Elsevier is delaying this issue of the journal until Ramseyer provides his response, the journal probably won’t be printed until April or later.

Elsevier had originally held to its plan of publishing Ramseyer’s paper, titled “Contracting for Sex in the Pacific War,” in the March edition of the journal along with a rebuttal and a statement of concern. But now the publisher has decided to include a response from the author himself.

A number of scholars have criticized Ramseyer’s paper for its lack of evidence and for mistakes he made in reaching his conclusion. Ramseyer argued in the paper that the comfort women for the Japanese army were voluntary prostitutes, only to later admit that he hadn’t been able to find any sex work contracts for the Korean comfort women.

Scholars who tracked Ramseyer’s citations even concluded that “he has not consulted a single actual contract concluded between a Korean comfort woman, or her family, and a recruiter or a comfort station.”

Some observers think that Elsevier is delaying publication of the journal so as to give Ramseyer time to come up with a defense that can allow the journal to run his paper anyway. That has led more people to demand that the paper itself be retracted. So far, 3,010 scholars have signed a petition asking for its retraction.

By Kim So-youn, staff reporter

Please direct comments or questions to [english@hani.co.kr]

Copyright © 한겨레. All rights reserved. 무단 전재, 재배포 및 크롤링 금지.

이 기사에 대해 어떻게 생각하시나요?