[Editorial] Opposition party irresponsible in claims that Moon administration "benefited enemy" with nuclear plant document
이 글자크기로 변경됩니다.
(예시) 가장 빠른 뉴스가 있고 다양한 정보, 쌍방향 소통이 숨쉬는 다음뉴스를 만나보세요. 다음뉴스는 국내외 주요이슈와 실시간 속보, 문화생활 및 다양한 분야의 뉴스를 입체적으로 전달하고 있습니다.
The allegation made by Kim Chong-in, interim leader of South Korea’s People Power Party (PPP), that the Moon administration sought to build a nuclear reactor in North Korea has become a political black hole that’s drawing attention away from all other issues.
“The Moon administration sought to build a nuclear reactor in North Korea in complete secrecy. That’s a shocking act that benefits the enemy,” Kim said on Jan. 29. In support of his claim, Kim cited charges filed by Korea’s public prosecutors in a case related to the doctoring and illegal destruction of official documents about the economic viability of the Wolsong nuclear reactor.
In the following days, the PPP has launched a steady stream of attacks on South Korean President Moon Jae-in. On Jan. 31, Kim pressed the government to explain why the project had been carried out in secret, while PPP floor leader Joo Ho-young called for a special prosecutor and a parliamentary probe. Former lawmaker Na Kyung-won and former Seoul mayor Oh Se-hoon sought to whip up political controversy by labeling the incident as an attempt to “bribe” North Korea with a nuclear plant.
It’s perfectly reasonable for the opposition party to grill the government over its policy. But it’s highly irresponsible to conclude from suspicions and circumstantial evidence that the government has “benefited the enemy” or to incite ideological divisions that can be exploited for political gain.
More specifically, Kim, as head of Korea’s major opposition party, isn’t convincing anyone with his repeated claims that “it’s unbelievable that a public servant would have reviewed something so explosive of their own volition” or that “the administration sought to build a nuclear reactor as a reward for North Korea.”
In a statement, the PPP’s foreign affairs and national security special committee said, “The documents indicated in the charges included a ‘plan for pursuing the construction of a nuclear power plant in North Korea.’ Even the name of the file alone is enough to raise questions about whether this was concretely considered at the government level.” Yet it failed to provide any objective evidence to back this up.
A responsible opposition party that cares about the national interest would be more objective about checking the facts first and offering reasonable grounds for allegations related to sensitive topics like inter-Korean relations.
The Blue House administration also needs to step up in dispelling suspicions. It has to state the facts clearly to disprove the false claims. Simply condemning the opposition’s offensive as a “Red-baiting operation” is not an effective approach to nipping this conflict in the bud.
Fortunately, the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE), whose deletion of data caused this whole kerfuffle in the first place, came out with a clarification on Jan. 31. “The document was six pages long and specified in its introduction that it was ‘information for internal consideration’ that ‘does not represent the government’s official position,’” it explained, adding that it “lists various possibilities as ‘ideas,’ including one that involves building nuclear power plants either in North Korea or South Korea for providing electricity to the North.”
We need to see more proactive information disclosure so that this unnecessary conflict can be swiftly put to bed. Things are difficult enough right now with the COVID-19 pandemic. Politicians should refrain from fanning confusion and division without a clear basis in fact.
Please direct comments or questions to [english@hani.co.kr]
Copyright © 한겨레신문사 All Rights Reserved. 무단 전재, 재배포, AI 학습 및 활용 금지
- [성한용 칼럼] 김종인 ‘색깔론’은 어울리지 않는다
- ‘북 원전 정치공세’ 위해 조현병 비하한 국민의힘…당사자 “편협·몰상식”
- ‘1% 유승민’이 ‘23% 이재명’만 집요하게 때리는 이유는?
- 박범계-윤석열 첫 상견례…검찰 간부 인사가 첫 시험대
- 미얀마 쿠데타, 미-중 대결에 영향…바이든 대외정책 첫 시험대
- 문 대통령 “구시대 정치로 대립 부추겨”…‘원전 공세’ 작심비판
- 경실련 “국회의원 부부 76명, 여의도 면적 47.5배 농지보유”
- 아스트라제네카 예방효과 62%.."고령층 접종 배제할 필요 없다"
- ‘반 공매도’ 표적 셀트리온·에이치엘비 주가 급등
- [리얼미터] 대선 선호도…이재명 23%, 윤석열 18%, 이낙연 13%