Round Lab, other sunscreen brands could mislead over functional benefits, Korea's consumer watchdog warns

2025. 6. 26. 15:58
음성재생 설정 이동 통신망에서 음성 재생 시 데이터 요금이 발생할 수 있습니다. 글자 수 10,000자 초과 시 일부만 음성으로 제공합니다.
글자크기 설정 파란원을 좌우로 움직이시면 글자크기가 변경 됩니다.

이 글자크기로 변경됩니다.

(예시) 가장 빠른 뉴스가 있고 다양한 정보, 쌍방향 소통이 숨쉬는 다음뉴스를 만나보세요. 다음뉴스는 국내외 주요이슈와 실시간 속보, 문화생활 및 다양한 분야의 뉴스를 입체적으로 전달하고 있습니다.

Korea's consumer watchdog has warned that some sunscreens on the market are advertising functional benefits such as whitening, trouble care and low irritation without undergoing official screening or providing objective evidence.
A customer looks at skincare products at a store in Myeong-dong, central Seoul, on May 27, 2025. [YONHAP]

Korea's consumer watchdog has warned that some sunscreens on the market are advertising functional benefits such as whitening, trouble care and low irritation without undergoing official screening or providing objective evidence.

The Korea Consumer Agency (KCA) said Thursday it had examined 38 sunscreen products currently sold in Korea and found that six of them had made claims that could mislead consumers into believing they had functional benefits without having passed the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety’s approval process for functional cosmetics.

One additional product listed inconsistent ingredient information between its online listing and packaging.

Among the violators, Sidmool's Ultra Facial Moisturizing Sun Cream and Enesti's New UV Cut Perfect Sun Stick claimed whitening and water resistance effects, respectively, but had not undergone functional cosmetics evaluation, according to the agency.

Round Lab's Birch Moisturizing Sunscreen displayed ingredient-based descriptions — such as “resurrection plant," claimed to have hydrating effects, and “portulaca extract” for soothing — which the KCA said could mislead consumers into believing the final product itself delivered those effects.

Other products made similarly questionable claims. BornTree's Berry Essence Sun Block advertised “skin soothing and anti-aging” effects, Tony Moly's The Chok Chok Green Tea Watery Sun Cream labeled itself “non-irritating,” and Fromrier's Vegan EGF Cica Water Sun Ampoule used the term “blemish care” — all without objective substantiation, the KCA said.

Meanwhile, the Dr.Jart+ Every Sun Day Moisturizing Sun product displayed ingredient information inconsistently between its product label and its online retail page.

The KCA has recommended that the companies behind these seven products revise or remove the problematic marketing claims.

“When choosing sunscreens, consumers should carefully review the ingredient list and be cautious of exaggerated claims that lack objective evidence,” the agency said.

Translated from the JoongAng Ilbo using generative AI and edited by Korea JoongAng Daily staff. BY JEONG HYE-JEONG [kim.juyeon2@joongang.co.kr]

Copyright © 코리아중앙데일리. 무단전재 및 재배포 금지.