Supreme Court allows divorced couples to nullify marriages

이수정 2024. 5. 23. 18:14
자동요약 기사 제목과 주요 문장을 기반으로 자동요약한 결과입니다.
전체 맥락을 이해하기 위해서는 본문 보기를 권장합니다.

This ran counter to a precedent set in a 1984 ruling from the Supreme Court, which found that a post-divorce marriage annulment carried "no benefit."

In addition, the Supreme Court on Thursday stated that a lawsuit on marriage annulment must precede the revision of family registration documents in order to "secure objective evidence."

글자크기 설정 파란원을 좌우로 움직이시면 글자크기가 변경 됩니다.

이 글자크기로 변경됩니다.

(예시) 가장 빠른 뉴스가 있고 다양한 정보, 쌍방향 소통이 숨쉬는 다음뉴스를 만나보세요. 다음뉴스는 국내외 주요이슈와 실시간 속보, 문화생활 및 다양한 분야의 뉴스를 입체적으로 전달하고 있습니다.

The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that divorced couples are eligible to nullify their marriages under certain circumstances, overturning a previous verdict which barred the annulment of such marriages.
A total of 13 judges at the Supreme Court sit to rule on cases appealed to the court on Thursday in Seocho District, southern Seoul. [NEWS1]

The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that divorced couples are eligible to nullify their marriages under certain circumstances, overturning a previous verdict which barred the annulment of such marriages.

The top court recognized that the interests of former spouses could be protected by voiding marriages even after legal separation. The ruling marks the first time in 40 years that post-divorce marriage annulments are allowed.

The court acknowledged annulment as “a valid and appropriate means of seeking and serving the legal interests of a divorced couple,” citing that it can help settle various types of relationships and related interests developed during marriage.

This ran counter to a precedent set in a 1984 ruling from the Supreme Court, which found that a post-divorce marriage annulment carried “no benefit."

The 1984 ruling also stated that the marriage of a divorced couple could not be invalidated after death, as it seemed to carry no practical benefit by doing so.

On Thursday, a total of 13 top judges unanimously voted in favor of a divorced woman in a case from the lower court, which dismissed a lawsuit requesting the judiciary to annul her marriage which lasted from 2001 to 2004.

“Denying the interests of a divorced couple will result in blocking people’s chances of seeking remedies for the damages incurred by [unlawful] marriages,” the top court said in the latest ruling.

The plaintiff said there was “no actual agreement” when she entered her marital relationship. She said that the marriage registration took place while she did not have full cognitive control of herself.

The complainant also claimed that she had been excluded from state benefits for single moms because of her marriage record.

The top court sent the case back to the Seoul Family Court to rule on the case.

In addition, the Supreme Court on Thursday stated that a lawsuit on marriage annulment must precede the revision of family registration documents in order to "secure objective evidence.”

The recent ruling “enabled remedial measures for people who experienced disadvantages due to miswritten records of a marriage which should be voided,” an official from the Supreme Court said.

BY LEE SOO-JUNG [lee.soojung1@joongang.co.kr]

Copyright © 코리아중앙데일리. 무단전재 및 재배포 금지.

이 기사에 대해 어떻게 생각하시나요?