Dead man's confession of gang rape rejected as evidence

2024. 5. 7. 15:57
글자크기 설정 파란원을 좌우로 움직이시면 글자크기가 변경 됩니다.

이 글자크기로 변경됩니다.

(예시) 가장 빠른 뉴스가 있고 다양한 정보, 쌍방향 소통이 숨쉬는 다음뉴스를 만나보세요. 다음뉴스는 국내외 주요이슈와 실시간 속보, 문화생활 및 다양한 분야의 뉴스를 입체적으로 전달하고 있습니다.

The Supreme Court recently overturned a lower court ruling that found three men guilty of group rape, based on the written confession left by another man before his death.

South Korea's highest court said the note left by the deceased cannot be used as evidence of the sexual crime in a criminal case, saying its credibility has not sufficiently been verified.

The deceased, who died at his apartment in Seoul in 2021, had apologized in what is thought to be a suicide note that he and three other friends got a younger girl drunk and raped her in 2006. Police launched an investigation on suspicion of "quasi-rape" -- a term defined as sexual intercourse while taking advantage of the victim's inability to resist, which carries the same punishment as rape.

The woman pinpointed as the victim in the note testified that she went home drunk on the day of the supposed crime, and that blood was on her underwear. She was prescribed an emergency contraceptive pill by a local physician the next day, but was not confirmed by medical authorities as having been raped.

Based on the findings, prosecutors charged the three men. After the district court found the note unsuitable as evidence, the appellate court sentenced them each to two years and six months in prison.

"It cannot be definitively said that the deceased wrote the notes with a clear intent to repent for his own crime. ... He had never mentioned the case to anyone, including to a friend who he had a drink with the day before his death, and it is possible that he wrote the note to ensure criminal punishment of the three defendants," the Supreme Court said in its ruling, saying it is unclear if the note tells the complete truth.

The court also pointed out that the deceased had never been investigated by the authorities, and that there is a possibility that his memory had been distorted over time. It also took issue with the fact that the content of the note was too vague, and some of it contradicted the victim's testimony.

The case was sent back to the Seoul High Court, which will hold legal proceedings on the case. The chance of a guilty verdict is very low, given that the note of the deceased had been the only evidence.

By Yoon Min-sik(minsikyoon@heraldcorp.com)

Copyright © 코리아헤럴드. 무단전재 및 재배포 금지.

이 기사에 대해 어떻게 생각하시나요?